Regenerative agriculture - Revision history

BranchOut at 22:08, 1 September 2023

2023-09-01T22:08:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 1 September 2023
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[Holistic Management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>		Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[Holistic Management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>

			= Corporate Greenwashing =

			Summer 2023, Bloomberg reported that [[Bayer-Monsanto]] sees a €100 Billion opportunity in the shift to regenerative agriculture,<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-20/bayer-sees-100-billion-opportunity-in-shift-to-regenerative-agriculture#xj4y7vzkg</ref> through a "doubling of accessible markets" and the "potential to shape regenerative agriculture on more than 400 million" acres.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2023-07-05/bayer-sees-more-than-doubling-of-accessible-markets-and-potential-to-shape-regenerative-agriculture-on-more-than-400-million-ac</ref> Bayer-Monsanto is already selling $10s of millions of "RoundUp Ready" carbon credits with crypto company [[Nori#Bayer-Monsanto\|Nori]].

	= Sources =		= Sources =

TH at 22:15, 31 August 2023

2023-08-31T22:15:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 31 August 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:

	<blockquote>Regenerative agriculture is a diverse, highly contested, and rapidly developing sustainable agriculture movement. It has been lauded for its transformative potential, and criticized for its incoherence and susceptibility for corporate co-option. '''At the heart of regenerative agriculture is an effort to engage with soil life rather than bypass it; this ethos and the messiness of the movement indicate that a range of novel human-soil relations may emerge within this space.'''</blockquote>		<blockquote>Regenerative agriculture is a diverse, highly contested, and rapidly developing sustainable agriculture movement. It has been lauded for its transformative potential, and criticized for its incoherence and susceptibility for corporate co-option. '''At the heart of regenerative agriculture is an effort to engage with soil life rather than bypass it; this ethos and the messiness of the movement indicate that a range of novel human-soil relations may emerge within this space.'''</blockquote>

Line 11:		Line 10:

	<blockquote>Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>

			See also: [[permaculture]] \| [[agroecology]]

	= Traditional Ecological Knowledge =		= Traditional Ecological Knowledge =
Line 20:		Line 21:
	Fully comprehending our stewardship role on Earth is vital to reversing the destructive effects of industrialized society and agriculture. Anything short of fully embracing this role (which we all must fulfill) will have long lasting devastating effects for us, future generations, and all other life on Earth.<Ref>https://branchoutnow.org/growing-sovereignty-turtle-island-and-the-future-of-food/</Ref></Blockquote>		Fully comprehending our stewardship role on Earth is vital to reversing the destructive effects of industrialized society and agriculture. Anything short of fully embracing this role (which we all must fulfill) will have long lasting devastating effects for us, future generations, and all other life on Earth.<Ref>https://branchoutnow.org/growing-sovereignty-turtle-island-and-the-future-of-food/</Ref></Blockquote>

	= ~~Academic Institutions~~ =		= USDA Research =

	== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==		== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==

TH at 04:46, 24 June 2023

2023-06-24T04:46:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 24 June 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:
	<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits.		<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits.

	Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; '''different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the creation of different kinds of relations.'''		Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; '''different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the creation of different kinds of relations.'''</blockquote>

	Zoom In: [[Knowledge Commons]]		Zoom In: [[Knowledge Commons]]

	Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>

	= Traditional Ecological Knowledge =		= Traditional Ecological Knowledge =

TH at 04:46, 24 June 2023

2023-06-24T04:46:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 24 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:

	<blockquote>Regenerative agriculture is a diverse, highly contested, and rapidly developing sustainable agriculture movement. It has been lauded for its transformative potential, and criticized for its incoherence and susceptibility for corporate co-option. '''At the heart of regenerative agriculture is an effort to engage with soil life rather than bypass it; this ethos and the messiness of the movement indicate that a range of novel human-soil relations may emerge within this space.'''</blockquote>		<blockquote>Regenerative agriculture is a diverse, highly contested, and rapidly developing sustainable agriculture movement. It has been lauded for its transformative potential, and criticized for its incoherence and susceptibility for corporate co-option. '''At the heart of regenerative agriculture is an effort to engage with soil life rather than bypass it; this ethos and the messiness of the movement indicate that a range of novel human-soil relations may emerge within this space.'''</blockquote>

			Zoom In: [[Soil Carbon]]

	<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits.		<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits.

	Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; '''different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the creation of different kinds of relations.'''		Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; '''different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the creation of different kinds of relations.'''

			Zoom In: [[Knowledge Commons]]

	Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>		Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>

TH at 04:45, 24 June 2023

2023-06-24T04:45:26Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits. Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the
+<blockquote>Regenerative agriculture is a diverse, highly contested, and rapidly developing sustainable agriculture movement. It has been lauded for its transformative potential, and criticized for its incoherence and susceptibility for corporate co-option. '''At the heart of regenerative agriculture is an effort to engage with soil life rather than bypass it; this ethos and the messiness of the movement indicate that a range of novel human-soil relations may emerge within this space.'''</blockquote>
-= Academia =
+<blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits.
 == MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==

TH at 21:32, 26 March 2023

2023-03-26T21:32:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 26 March 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[Holistic Management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>		Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[Holistic Management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>

			= Sources =

TH: /* MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture */

2023-02-27T03:38:59Z

MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 27 February 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==		== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==

	Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[~~holistic management~~]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>		Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[Holistic Management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>

TH: /* Soil Grab Greenwashing */

2023-02-26T05:45:43Z

Soil Grab Greenwashing

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <blockquote> Overall, narratives indicate that a wide range of human-soil relations can be identified within regenerative agriculture, including care, exploitation, and relatively novel mechanisms of commodification and financialization of soil life through the development of soil carbon credits. Further, results indicate that this variation is produced by differences in human approaches to understanding, analyzing, and managing soil life; different approaches to producing knowledge about soils facilitates the
 creation of different kinds of relations. Building on the narratives, it is argued that the human should be theoretically (re)centered in the social science study of regenerative agriculture and human-soil relations, in order to maintain a uniquely human sense of responsibility to address, among other challenges, climate change. Similarly, the role of alternative ontological outlooks on soils and nature in food system transformation is discussed.<ref>https://edepot.wur.nl/571000</ref></blockquote>
 = Academia =

TH: /* MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture */

2023-02-25T20:45:11Z

MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 25 February 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==		== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==

	Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[holistic management]] in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>		Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[holistic management]]) in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>

TH at 20:44, 25 February 2023

2023-02-25T20:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 25 February 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:

	The article addresses [[Cargill]] and [[Microsoft]] explicitly and references other corporate players in citations.		The article addresses [[Cargill]] and [[Microsoft]] explicitly and references other corporate players in citations.

			= Academia =

			== MSU Center for Regenerative Agriculture ==

			Directed by Jason Rowntree, a Savory Hub. Leading a $19 million project funded by the [[Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research]] in 2022 to research and develop the Savory Institute's EOV protocol (based on [[Allan Savory]]'s [[holistic management]] in collaboration with the [[USDA]], [[Savory Institute]], [[The Nature Conservancy]], and others.<ref>https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/msu-researchers-play-pivotal-role-in-new-grazing-soil-health-project</ref>