SHAC - Revision history

Florez4747: /* Atlanta Forest Defenders */

2023-08-02T22:35:39Z

Atlanta Forest Defenders

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 2 August 2023
Line 41:		Line 41:
	= Atlanta Forest Defenders =		= Atlanta Forest Defenders =
	See also: [[Atlanta Forest Defenders]]<br><br>		See also: [[Atlanta Forest Defenders]]<br><br>


	The revolutionaries resisting against the cop city project in Atlanta have used many of the SHAC techniques developed, through targeting of specific contractors that have been hired to build cop city and other individuals who are linked to the construction of Cop City. One of the targets was Reeves Young and through persistent demonstrations targeted specifically at him he pulled out of the Atlanta Police Foundation and is no longer associated with the project.<Ref>https://earthfirstjournal.news/2022/04/29/victory-for-atlanta-forest-reeves-young-has-backed-out/</Ref><Ref>https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/01/27/police-murder-forest-defender-near-atlantas-proposed-cop-city/</Ref>		The revolutionaries resisting against the cop city project in Atlanta have used many of the SHAC techniques developed, through targeting of specific contractors that have been hired to build cop city and other individuals who are linked to the construction of Cop City. One of the targets was Reeves Young and through persistent demonstrations targeted specifically at him he pulled out of the Atlanta Police Foundation and is no longer associated with the project.<Ref>https://earthfirstjournal.news/2022/04/29/victory-for-atlanta-forest-reeves-young-has-backed-out/</Ref><Ref>https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/01/27/police-murder-forest-defender-near-atlantas-proposed-cop-city/</Ref>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* Atlanta Forest Defenders */

2023-08-02T22:35:05Z

Atlanta Forest Defenders

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 2 August 2023
Line 40:		Line 40:

	= Atlanta Forest Defenders =		= Atlanta Forest Defenders =
	See also: [[Atlanta Forest Defenders]]		See also: [[Atlanta Forest Defenders]]<br><br>


			The revolutionaries resisting against the cop city project in Atlanta have used many of the SHAC techniques developed, through targeting of specific contractors that have been hired to build cop city and other individuals who are linked to the construction of Cop City. One of the targets was Reeves Young and through persistent demonstrations targeted specifically at him he pulled out of the Atlanta Police Foundation and is no longer associated with the project.<Ref>https://earthfirstjournal.news/2022/04/29/victory-for-atlanta-forest-reeves-young-has-backed-out/</Ref><Ref>https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/01/27/police-murder-forest-defender-near-atlantas-proposed-cop-city/</Ref>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747 at 22:28, 2 August 2023

2023-08-02T22:28:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 2 August 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:

	This contrasts sharply with the way momentum in certain green anarchist circles died off after the turn of the century, when the goals and targets became too expansive and abstract. It had been easy for individuals to motivate themselves to defend specific trees and natural areas, but once the point for some participants was to “destroy civilization” and everything less was mere reformism, it was impossible to work out what constituted meaningful action.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		This contrasts sharply with the way momentum in certain green anarchist circles died off after the turn of the century, when the goals and targets became too expansive and abstract. It had been easy for individuals to motivate themselves to defend specific trees and natural areas, but once the point for some participants was to “destroy civilization” and everything less was mere reformism, it was impossible to work out what constituted meaningful action.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>


			= Atlanta Forest Defenders =
			See also: [[Atlanta Forest Defenders]]

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* Relationship Between Public and Underground Organizing */

2023-08-02T22:23:06Z

Relationship Between Public and Underground Organizing

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 2 August 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	== Relationship Between Public and Underground Organizing ==		== Relationship Between Public and Underground Organizing ==
	<Blockquote>More than any other direct action campaign in recent history, the SHAC campaign achieved a perfect symbiosis of public organizing and underground action. To this end, the campaign was characterized by an extremely savvy use of technology and modern networking. The SHAC websites disseminated information about targets and provided a forum for action reports to raise morale and expectations, enabling anyone sympathetic to the goals of the campaign to play a part without drawing attention to themselves.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		<Blockquote>More than any other direct action campaign in recent history, the SHAC campaign achieved a perfect symbiosis of public organizing and underground action. To this end, the campaign was characterized by an extremely savvy use of technology and modern networking. The SHAC websites disseminated information about targets and provided a forum for action reports to raise morale and expectations, enabling anyone sympathetic to the goals of the campaign to play a part without drawing attention to themselves.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>


			== Diversity of Tactics ==
			<Blockquote>Rather than pitting exponents of different tactics against each other, SHAC integrated all possible tactics into one campaign, in which each approach complemented the others. This meant that participants could choose from a practically limitless array of options, which opened the campaign to a wide range of people and averted needless conflicts.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

			== Concrete Targets, Concrete Motivations ==
			<Blockquote>The fact that there were specific animals suffering, whose lives could be saved by specific direct action, made the issues concrete and lent the campaign a sense of urgency that translated into a willingness on the part of participants to push themselves out of their comfort zones. Likewise, at every juncture in the SHAC campaign, there were intermediate goals that could easily be accomplished, so the monumental task of undermining an entire corporation never felt overwhelming.<br>

			This contrasts sharply with the way momentum in certain green anarchist circles died off after the turn of the century, when the goals and targets became too expansive and abstract. It had been easy for individuals to motivate themselves to defend specific trees and natural areas, but once the point for some participants was to “destroy civilization” and everything less was mere reformism, it was impossible to work out what constituted meaningful action.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* Techniques */

2023-08-02T22:21:21Z

Techniques

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 2 August 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Secondary and tertiary targeting works because the targets do not have a vested interest in continuing their involvement with the primary target. There are other places they can take their business, and they have no reason not to do so. This is a vital aspect of the SHAC model. If a business is cornered, they’ll fight to the death, and nothing will matter in the conflict except the pure force each party is able to bring to bear on the other; this is not generally to the advantage of activists, as corporations can bring in the police and government. This is why, apart from the axe handle incident, so few efforts in the SHAC campaign have been directed at HLS itself. Somewhere between the primary target and the associated corporations that provide its support structure, there appears to be a fulcrum where action is most effective. It might seem strange to go after tertiary targets that have no connection to the primary target themselves, but countless HLS customers have dropped relations after a client of theirs was embarrassed.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		Secondary and tertiary targeting works because the targets do not have a vested interest in continuing their involvement with the primary target. There are other places they can take their business, and they have no reason not to do so. This is a vital aspect of the SHAC model. If a business is cornered, they’ll fight to the death, and nothing will matter in the conflict except the pure force each party is able to bring to bear on the other; this is not generally to the advantage of activists, as corporations can bring in the police and government. This is why, apart from the axe handle incident, so few efforts in the SHAC campaign have been directed at HLS itself. Somewhere between the primary target and the associated corporations that provide its support structure, there appears to be a fulcrum where action is most effective. It might seem strange to go after tertiary targets that have no connection to the primary target themselves, but countless HLS customers have dropped relations after a client of theirs was embarrassed.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

			== Relationship Between Public and Underground Organizing ==
			<Blockquote>More than any other direct action campaign in recent history, the SHAC campaign achieved a perfect symbiosis of public organizing and underground action. To this end, the campaign was characterized by an extremely savvy use of technology and modern networking. The SHAC websites disseminated information about targets and provided a forum for action reports to raise morale and expectations, enabling anyone sympathetic to the goals of the campaign to play a part without drawing attention to themselves.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* US Origins */

2023-08-02T22:19:09Z

US Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 2 August 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Whereas an individual might feel insignificant at an antiwar march of thousands, if she was one of a dozen people at a home demonstration that caused an investor to pull out, she could feel that she had personally accomplished something concrete. The SHAC campaign offered the kind of sustained low-intensity conflict through which people can become radicalized and develop a sense of collective power. Running in black blocs with friends, evading police after demonstrations, listening to inspirational speeches together, walking through offices yelling on bullhorns, reading other activists’ reports online, the feeling of being on the winning side of an effective liberation struggle—all these contributed to the seemingly unstoppable momentum of the SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		Whereas an individual might feel insignificant at an antiwar march of thousands, if she was one of a dozen people at a home demonstration that caused an investor to pull out, she could feel that she had personally accomplished something concrete. The SHAC campaign offered the kind of sustained low-intensity conflict through which people can become radicalized and develop a sense of collective power. Running in black blocs with friends, evading police after demonstrations, listening to inspirational speeches together, walking through offices yelling on bullhorns, reading other activists’ reports online, the feeling of being on the winning side of an effective liberation struggle—all these contributed to the seemingly unstoppable momentum of the SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>


			= Techniques =
			== Secondary and Tertiary Targeting ==
			<Blockquote>The SHAC campaign set about depriving HLS of its support structure. Just as a living organism depends on an entire ecosystem for the resources and relationships it needs to survive, a corporation cannot function without investors and business partners. In this regard, more so than any standard boycott, property destruction, or publicity campaign, SHAC confronted HLS on the terms most threatening to a corporation. Starbucks could easily afford a thousand times the cost of the windows smashed by the black bloc during the Seattle WTO protests, but if no one would replace those windows—or the windows had been broken at the houses of investors, so no one would invest in the corporation—it would be another story. SHAC organizers made a point of learning the inner workings of the capitalist economy, so they could strike most strategically. <br><br>

			Secondary and tertiary targeting works because the targets do not have a vested interest in continuing their involvement with the primary target. There are other places they can take their business, and they have no reason not to do so. This is a vital aspect of the SHAC model. If a business is cornered, they’ll fight to the death, and nothing will matter in the conflict except the pure force each party is able to bring to bear on the other; this is not generally to the advantage of activists, as corporations can bring in the police and government. This is why, apart from the axe handle incident, so few efforts in the SHAC campaign have been directed at HLS itself. Somewhere between the primary target and the associated corporations that provide its support structure, there appears to be a fulcrum where action is most effective. It might seem strange to go after tertiary targets that have no connection to the primary target themselves, but countless HLS customers have dropped relations after a client of theirs was embarrassed.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* US Origins */

2023-08-02T22:02:32Z

US Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 2 August 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<Blockquote> SHAC USA got started in January 2001, just as Stephens, Inc. saved HLS from bankruptcy. Stephens was based in Little Rock, Arkansas, so a number of activists moved there to organize. In April, 14 beagles were liberated from the new HLS lab in New Jersey; at the end of October, hundreds of people gathered in Little Rock for a weekend of demonstrations at Warren Stephens’ home and the offices of Stephens, Inc. By the following spring, Stephens had ditched HLS, breaking off a five-year contract after only one year.<br>		<Blockquote> SHAC USA got started in January 2001, just as Stephens, Inc. saved HLS from bankruptcy. Stephens was based in Little Rock, Arkansas, so a number of activists moved there to organize. In April, 14 beagles were liberated from the new HLS lab in New Jersey; at the end of October, hundreds of people gathered in Little Rock for a weekend of demonstrations at Warren Stephens’ home and the offices of Stephens, Inc. By the following spring, Stephens had ditched HLS, breaking off a five-year contract after only one year.<br>

	Unrivaled by any campaign of comparable scale and effectiveness, SHAC took off quickly in the US. Thanks in part to superior funding,~~[3]~~ the propaganda was colorful and exciting, as were promotional videos that juxtaposed heart-wrenching clips of animal cruelty with inspiring demonstration footage to a pulse-racing soundtrack of techno music. The campaign offered participants a wide range of options, including civil disobedience, office disruptions, property destruction, call-ins, pranks, tabling, and home demonstrations. In contrast to the heyday of anti-globalization summit-hopping, targets were available all around the country, limited only by activists’ imaginations and research. The intermediate goals of forcing specific investors and business partners to disconnect from HLS were often easily accomplished, providing immediate gratification to participants.<br>		Unrivaled by any campaign of comparable scale and effectiveness, SHAC took off quickly in the US. Thanks in part to superior funding, the propaganda was colorful and exciting, as were promotional videos that juxtaposed heart-wrenching clips of animal cruelty with inspiring demonstration footage to a pulse-racing soundtrack of techno music. The campaign offered participants a wide range of options, including civil disobedience, office disruptions, property destruction, call-ins, pranks, tabling, and home demonstrations. In contrast to the heyday of anti-globalization summit-hopping, targets were available all around the country, limited only by activists’ imaginations and research. The intermediate goals of forcing specific investors and business partners to disconnect from HLS were often easily accomplished, providing immediate gratification to participants.<br>

	Whereas an individual might feel insignificant at an antiwar march of thousands, if she was one of a dozen people at a home demonstration that caused an investor to pull out, she could feel that she had personally accomplished something concrete. The SHAC campaign offered the kind of sustained low-intensity conflict through which people can become radicalized and develop a sense of collective power. Running in black blocs with friends, evading police after demonstrations, listening to inspirational speeches together, walking through offices yelling on bullhorns, reading other activists’ reports online, the feeling of being on the winning side of an effective liberation struggle—all these contributed to the seemingly unstoppable momentum of the SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		Whereas an individual might feel insignificant at an antiwar march of thousands, if she was one of a dozen people at a home demonstration that caused an investor to pull out, she could feel that she had personally accomplished something concrete. The SHAC campaign offered the kind of sustained low-intensity conflict through which people can become radicalized and develop a sense of collective power. Running in black blocs with friends, evading police after demonstrations, listening to inspirational speeches together, walking through offices yelling on bullhorns, reading other activists’ reports online, the feeling of being on the winning side of an effective liberation struggle—all these contributed to the seemingly unstoppable momentum of the SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* US Origins */

2023-08-02T22:02:06Z

US Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 2 August 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:

	One of the activsits, Kevin Kjonaas<Ref>https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2006/01/americas-1-threat/</Ref>, would become the president of SHAC USA, and was in Britain during the height of the British SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref>		One of the activsits, Kevin Kjonaas<Ref>https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2006/01/americas-1-threat/</Ref>, would become the president of SHAC USA, and was in Britain during the height of the British SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref>

			<Blockquote> SHAC USA got started in January 2001, just as Stephens, Inc. saved HLS from bankruptcy. Stephens was based in Little Rock, Arkansas, so a number of activists moved there to organize. In April, 14 beagles were liberated from the new HLS lab in New Jersey; at the end of October, hundreds of people gathered in Little Rock for a weekend of demonstrations at Warren Stephens’ home and the offices of Stephens, Inc. By the following spring, Stephens had ditched HLS, breaking off a five-year contract after only one year.<br>

			Unrivaled by any campaign of comparable scale and effectiveness, SHAC took off quickly in the US. Thanks in part to superior funding,[3] the propaganda was colorful and exciting, as were promotional videos that juxtaposed heart-wrenching clips of animal cruelty with inspiring demonstration footage to a pulse-racing soundtrack of techno music. The campaign offered participants a wide range of options, including civil disobedience, office disruptions, property destruction, call-ins, pranks, tabling, and home demonstrations. In contrast to the heyday of anti-globalization summit-hopping, targets were available all around the country, limited only by activists’ imaginations and research. The intermediate goals of forcing specific investors and business partners to disconnect from HLS were often easily accomplished, providing immediate gratification to participants.<br>

			Whereas an individual might feel insignificant at an antiwar march of thousands, if she was one of a dozen people at a home demonstration that caused an investor to pull out, she could feel that she had personally accomplished something concrete. The SHAC campaign offered the kind of sustained low-intensity conflict through which people can become radicalized and develop a sense of collective power. Running in black blocs with friends, evading police after demonstrations, listening to inspirational speeches together, walking through offices yelling on bullhorns, reading other activists’ reports online, the feeling of being on the winning side of an effective liberation struggle—all these contributed to the seemingly unstoppable momentum of the SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* Origins */

2023-08-02T22:00:24Z

Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 2 August 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:

	On December 21, 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange; three months later, it lost its place on the main platform of the London Stock Exchange as well. HLS was only saved from bankruptcy when its largest remaining shareholder, the American investment bank Stephens, gave the company a $15 million loan. This chapter of the story closed with HLS moving its financial center to the United States to take advantage of US laws allowing greater anonymity for shareholders.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		On December 21, 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange; three months later, it lost its place on the main platform of the London Stock Exchange as well. HLS was only saved from bankruptcy when its largest remaining shareholder, the American investment bank Stephens, gave the company a $15 million loan. This chapter of the story closed with HLS moving its financial center to the United States to take advantage of US laws allowing greater anonymity for shareholders.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>

			== US Origins ==
			Animal rights activists in the so-called United States had spent much of the 1990's organizing anti-fur campaigns and many felt the returns to their actions were stagnating. Activists were looking to pivot to new techniques, so there was somewhat of split within the community with one group moving towards promoting veganism and others looking for more militant outlets.<br>

			One of the activsits, Kevin Kjonaas<Ref>https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2006/01/americas-1-threat/</Ref>, would become the president of SHAC USA, and was in Britain during the height of the British SHAC campaign.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref>

	= Sources =		= Sources =

Florez4747: /* Origins */

2023-08-02T21:51:04Z

Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 2 August 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Huntingdon Life Sciences was a more formidable target than any individual animal breeder; the SHAC campaign constituted an escalation in animal rights activism in Britain. The idea was to focus specifically on the corporation’s finances, utilizing the tactics that had closed small businesses to shut down an entire corporation. Activists set out to isolate HLS by harassing anyone involved with any corporation that did business with them. The role of SHAC as an organization was simply to distribute information about potential targets and report on actions as they occurred.<br>		Huntingdon Life Sciences was a more formidable target than any individual animal breeder; the SHAC campaign constituted an escalation in animal rights activism in Britain. The idea was to focus specifically on the corporation’s finances, utilizing the tactics that had closed small businesses to shut down an entire corporation. Activists set out to isolate HLS by harassing anyone involved with any corporation that did business with them. The role of SHAC as an organization was simply to distribute information about potential targets and report on actions as they occurred.<br>

	In January 2000, British activists publicized a list of the largest shareholders in HLS, including those who held shares through third parties for anonymity—one of which was Britain’s Labour Party. Following two weeks of pitched demonstrations, many shareholders sold their holdings; finally, 32 million shares were placed on the London Stock Exchange for one penny each and HLS stocks crashed. In the ensuing chaos, the Royal Bank of Scotland wrote off an £11.6 million loan in exchange for a payment of just £1 in order to distance itself from the company, and the British government arranged for the state-owned Bank of England to give them an account because no other bank would do business with them. The company’s share price, worth around £300 in the 1990s, fell to £1.75 in January 2001, stabilizing at 3 pence by mid-2001.<br>		'''In January 2000, British activists publicized a list of the largest shareholders in HLS, including those who held shares through third parties for anonymity—one of which was Britain’s Labour Party. Following two weeks of pitched demonstrations, many shareholders sold their holdings; finally, 32 million shares were placed on the London Stock Exchange for one penny each and HLS stocks crashed. In the ensuing chaos, the Royal Bank of Scotland wrote off an £11.6 million loan in exchange for a payment of just £1 in order to distance itself from the company, and the British government arranged for the state-owned Bank of England to give them an account because no other bank would do business with them. The company’s share price, worth around £300 in the 1990s, fell to £1.75 in January 2001, stabilizing at 3 pence by mid-2001.'''<br>

	On December 21, 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange; three months later, it lost its place on the main platform of the London Stock Exchange as well. HLS was only saved from bankruptcy when its largest remaining shareholder, the American investment bank Stephens, gave the company a $15 million loan. This chapter of the story closed with HLS moving its financial center to the United States to take advantage of US laws allowing greater anonymity for shareholders.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>		On December 21, 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange; three months later, it lost its place on the main platform of the London Stock Exchange as well. HLS was only saved from bankruptcy when its largest remaining shareholder, the American investment bank Stephens, gave the company a $15 million loan. This chapter of the story closed with HLS moving its financial center to the United States to take advantage of US laws allowing greater anonymity for shareholders.<Ref>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-the-shac-model</Ref></Blockquote>



	= Sources =		= Sources =