Citigroup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Florez4747 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Florez4747 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== Dakota Access Pipeline === | === Dakota Access Pipeline === | ||
Citi was one of 17 banks who helped finance the Dakota Access Pipeline. Citi met with the Standing Rock Nation to discuss the potential impacts of the pipeline and claimed to have learned a lot from these talks and vowed to take what they learned into the future when financing fossil fuel projects. <Ref>https://blog.citigroup.com/2017/04/dakota-access-pipeline-review-whats-ahead/</Ref> | Citi was one of 17 banks who helped finance the Dakota Access Pipeline. Citi met with the Standing Rock Nation to discuss the potential impacts of the pipeline and claimed to have learned a lot from these talks and vowed to take what they learned into the future when financing fossil fuel projects to respect Indigenous sovereignty. <Ref>https://blog.citigroup.com/2017/04/dakota-access-pipeline-review-whats-ahead/</Ref> | ||
=== Amazon Oil Companies === | === Amazon Oil Companies === | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 29 December 2022
Investment In Fossil Fuels
From 2016 to 2021 Citi has financed 285 billion dollars into fossil fuel projects second only to JPMorgan Chase. [1]
Dakota Access Pipeline
Citi was one of 17 banks who helped finance the Dakota Access Pipeline. Citi met with the Standing Rock Nation to discuss the potential impacts of the pipeline and claimed to have learned a lot from these talks and vowed to take what they learned into the future when financing fossil fuel projects to respect Indigenous sovereignty. [2]