ProPublica: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "ProPublica has been targeted by Exxon Mobil private intelligence partner Stratfor.<ref>http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/stratfor_provided_energy_industry_with_intel_on_environmental_groups/</ref> Report on "Why Carbon Credits For Forest Preservation May Be Worse Than Nothing"<ref>https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-ca...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ProPublica has been targeted by [[Exxon Mobil# | ProPublica has been targeted by [[Exxon Mobil#Private_Intelligence|Exxon Mobil]] private intelligence partner [[Stratfor]].<ref>http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/stratfor_provided_energy_industry_with_intel_on_environmental_groups/</ref> | ||
Report on "Why Carbon Credits For Forest Preservation May Be Worse Than Nothing"<ref>https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-cambodia/</ref> | Report on "Why Carbon Credits For Forest Preservation May Be Worse Than Nothing"<ref>https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-cambodia/</ref> |
Latest revision as of 03:29, 11 March 2023
ProPublica has been targeted by Exxon Mobil private intelligence partner Stratfor.[1]
Report on "Why Carbon Credits For Forest Preservation May Be Worse Than Nothing"[2]