Verra: Difference between revisions

From Climate Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Founded as '''Verified Carbon Standard''' in 2005 by a consortium led by the [[World Economic Forum]]. Has since become the largest vendor in the voluntary carbon market.
In 2005, Climate Wedge and Cheyne Capital drafted v1 of the Voluntary Carbon Standard. In March 2006, they transferred the Voluntary Carbon Standard version 1.0 to The Climate Group, International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and [[World Economic Forum]].
 
Verra has since become the largest vendor in the voluntary carbon market.


= Greenwashing =
= Greenwashing =
Line 32: Line 34:
=== Systemic Analysis ===
=== Systemic Analysis ===


Up to 94% of Verra's 'prevented deforestation' credits are worthless
A nine-month investigation published January 2023 by ''The Guardian'', ''Die Zeit'', and SourceMaterial found that an estimated 94% of the rainforest [[carbon offsets]] provided by Verra are worthless. These account for about 40% of all credits it has approved. They also found that the credit scheme may worsen [[global burning]], and the deforestation baseline for Verra projects was overstated by 400% on average relative to 'non-protected' forest. At one of Verra's project sites in Peru, residents complained about being forcefully evicted from their homes, which were then demolished. The investigation was based on two peer-reviewed studies, one by a group of [[University of Cambridge]] scientists and the other from a team of international researchers <ref>https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2004334117</ref> <ref>https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.13970</ref>, as well as a third study still in peer-review.<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03354</ref>
<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe</ref>


study #1:
Verra denied the claims and criticized the methodology of the studies; the IETA argued "all voices need to be included."
<ref>https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2004334117</ref>
 
study #2:
<ref>https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.13970</ref>
 
study #3:
<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03354</ref>


=== Mai Ndombe ===
=== Mai Ndombe ===
Line 49: Line 43:


One source for the [[Nature Carbon Ton ($NCT)|$NCT]] of [[Toucan Protocol]] and [[Regen Network]].
One source for the [[Nature Carbon Ton ($NCT)|$NCT]] of [[Toucan Protocol]] and [[Regen Network]].
= Tokenization =
In Fall of 2021, the demand for Verra's carbon credits driven by tokenization for the launch of [[Toucan Protocol]] and [[Klima DAO]] accounted for 25% of all of Verra's sales.
Following a 4/7/22 token vetting performed by [[Carbon Plan]]<ref>https://carbonplan.org/research/toucan-crypto-offsets</ref> and publicized by [[Bloomberg News]]<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-07/the-biggest-crypto-effort-to-end-useless-carbon-offsets-is-backfiring?leadSource=uverify%20wall</ref>, Verra announced it would prohibit the tokenization of retired credits by Toucan Protocol or other parties. (see also: <https://redd-monitor.org/2022/04/11/toucans-crypto-layer-on-top-of-carbon-offsets-is-expanding-the-market-for-toxic-hot-air/>)
The following month, Verra announced that it was prohibiting the tokenization of "retired" credits but would create a new category of "immobilized" credits which could be tokenized instead to avoid "mind frying" confusion in the [[voluntary carbon market]].<ref>https://redd-monitor.org/2022/05/29/verra-prohibits-tokenisation-of-retired-offsets-toucan-welcomes-the-news/</ref> According to Toucan Protocol's blog, this announcement stemmed from a "lengthy dialogue" between the two corporations.<ref>https://blog.toucan.earth/response-to-verras-announcement/</ref> Both companies belong to the IETA along with the world's largest fossil fuel corporations and [[Wall Street]] banks.
= Sources =

Revision as of 00:53, 17 February 2023

In 2005, Climate Wedge and Cheyne Capital drafted v1 of the Voluntary Carbon Standard. In March 2006, they transferred the Voluntary Carbon Standard version 1.0 to The Climate Group, International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and World Economic Forum.

Verra has since become the largest vendor in the voluntary carbon market.

Greenwashing

Many factors would suggest that Verra credits have little credibility as legitimate carbon offset, and are more likely a vehicle for greenwashing.

Industrial Collusion

Verra is a member of the International Emissions Trading Association, whose membership includes top petroleum corporations such as British Petroeum, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Enbridge, Equinor, ExxonMobil, Saudi Aramco, and Shell Oil. These companies are currently engaged in extensive greenwashing campaigns which include the use of Verra's offsets.[1]

Most if not all of them have known about global warming and other signs of climate collapse for decades, all the while casting doubt on or outright denying the reality. See also: Fossil Fuel Industry Disinformation.

IETA members further include:[2]

Monoculture Plantations

Eucalyptus Forestry

The project title on the Verra protect database is “‘Guanaré’ forest plantations on degraded grasslands under extensive grazing”. The project consists of more than 21,000 hectares of eucalyptus monocultures. The project was set up by Guanaré AS, a Uruguayan forestry investment firm founded by Peter Lyford Pyke. The industrial forestry operations on the ground are carried out by Agroempresa Forestal, a Uruguayan company. The timber is harvested and shipped to India and China.[3]

EcoPlanet Bamboo

<https://redd-monitor.org/2018/04/27/has-ecoplanet-bamboo-really-found-a-buyer-for-its-bamboo-in-nicaragua/> <https://theecologist.org/2011/aug/30/bamboo-can-it-live-green-gold-hype>

Rainforest Protection

Systemic Analysis

A nine-month investigation published January 2023 by The Guardian, Die Zeit, and SourceMaterial found that an estimated 94% of the rainforest carbon offsets provided by Verra are worthless. These account for about 40% of all credits it has approved. They also found that the credit scheme may worsen global burning, and the deforestation baseline for Verra projects was overstated by 400% on average relative to 'non-protected' forest. At one of Verra's project sites in Peru, residents complained about being forcefully evicted from their homes, which were then demolished. The investigation was based on two peer-reviewed studies, one by a group of University of Cambridge scientists and the other from a team of international researchers [4] [5], as well as a third study still in peer-review.[6]

Verra denied the claims and criticized the methodology of the studies; the IETA argued "all voices need to be included."

Mai Ndombe

<https://redd-monitor.org/2022/07/15/after-11-years-many-villagers-wonder-what-they-get-from-wildlife-works-carbons-mai-ndombe-redd-project/>

One source for the $NCT of Toucan Protocol and Regen Network.